jump to navigation

Khalid al-Islambouli: “I have killed the Pharaoh!” August 19, 2008

Posted by revolution in : Egypt, Jihād, miraculous , 2 comments

One of the prime Shuhada‘ of the modern age, the man who stood in the face of tyranny and crushed it, Khalid Ahmed Showky Al-Islambouli - may Allah have mercy upon him and grant him the highest level in Jannah - rushed to the stands of the treacherous Tyrant Anwar Sadat, not looking to the East or West in cowardice, aimed his assault rifle and emptied it into Sadat’s body, shouting:

“I have killed the Pharaoh!”

And indeed, he had killed the Pharaoh of Egypt that had its spirits re-living in the veins of Sadat, and indeed he squashed the Pharaoh, leaving a legacy behind him of other brave men who will tear apart the Pharaoh’s of their time.

The name of Allah on a Mountain in Madinah! July 19, 2008

Posted by revolution in : miraculous , 13 comments

Mashaa’Allaah, either someone etched this out on the Mountain of Madinah or it is a miracle from Allah. Either way, it is very pleasing to the eye of the believer to see such a sight.

Here is a negative satellite view of the image.

And here is the satellite view of the image.

AllahuAkbar.

“I’m waiting for you” July 8, 2008

Posted by revolution in : As-Sahāb Media, Jihād, Knowledge, True Shuyūkh, miraculous , 2 comments

Shaykh Abul Layth al-Libi, may Allah have mercy upon him, before he was shaheed, saw a dream, in which Ameer Shakirullah was staying in the first heaven (without going to Jannah)… He (Shaykh Abul Layth) questioned him (in astonishment) why he was waiting there? He replied “I’m waiting for you.”

- And Inshaa’Allaah they are now united in the hearts of green birds.

[Taken from As-Sahab's release, "Jihad and Martyrdom"]

One looks at this and can only ask himself, “…and where am I?”

Inside the Taliban Jailbreak July 3, 2008

Posted by revolution in : Afghānistān, Jihād, Knowledge, News, miraculous , 4 comments

[Click on image for larger viewing]

This is an excellent article from the globe and mail regarding the massive Taliban jailbreak. When one knows the details of the prison break, one is able to appreciate how Allah helps the believers in the most unique of ways as well as the intelligence of the Mujaahideen which Allah has blessed them with. The tactics employed by the Mujaahideen were very intelligent and one can get a sense that they were thoughtful of the circumstances that may or may not happen. Let this be a reminder to the Kuffaar and Murtadeen who are fighting us that the Army of Muhammad is coming to cut off their heads and blow them into pieces and make the word of Allah supreme. AllahuAkbar! May Allah allow the Mujaahideen to pull off more successful operations as such.

Inside The Taliban Jailbreak
by Graeme Smith
Globe and Mail, July 2, 2008

The prison cells that once held Taliban sit almost empty, with little remaining except rubbish: plates of rice ready for meals never eaten, and sandals discarded by fugitives who ran away in bare feet. Some of the debris inside Sarpoza prison offer hints about what happened amid the chaos last month when the Taliban accomplished one of the largest jailbreaks in modern history, freeing at least 800 prisoners and rampaging into Kandahar without facing any serious resistance from Canadian troops or the other forces assigned to protect the city.

A chunk of metal the size of a picnic table sits 125 metres away from the site where a truck bomb hit the gate, testifying to the force of the explosion. In a room where prison officials believe the inmates planned their escape, bullet casings on the floor suggest the prisoners had smuggled at least one handgun into the cells.

With those scattered bits of evidence, and a dozen interviews with witnesses, a picture emerges of the way security collapsed in the largest city in southern Afghanistan on the evening of Friday, June 13. Details of the attack show not only why the city defences fell apart; they also illustrate how the notorious problems of the Afghan mission – corruption, poor intelligence, a distrustful population, weak Afghan security forces, a lack of foreign troops – made the ingredients of a disaster.

The Canadian military has not escaped blame. In a private session two days after the attack, Kandahar’s provincial council strongly criticized the foreign troops for arriving at Sarpoza roughly two hours after the jailbreak started. They demanded to know why Canadian soldiers watched the prisoners run away and failed to chase them. Witnesses say that hundreds of inmates spent their first night of freedom camping in the fields only a few kilometres south of the prison, within easy reach of the Canadian soldiers sent to investigate.

Brigadier-General Denis Thompson, the top Canadian commander in Kandahar, confirmed that NATO surveillance tracked the fugitives as they fled. But he said it’s not Canada’s job as part of the International Security Assistance Force to hunt down escaped prisoners.

“You can ask yourself the rhetorical question, what if we find 100 fugitives in the fields?” Gen. Thompson said. “What is ISAF’s duty in that circumstance? Is it to go arrest people?”

The commander continued: “We’re not policing this country, right? It’s not our role to police this country. Our role is to stand behind our Afghan partners and assist them.”

But the Afghan forces stationed nearby did not consider themselves capable of standing up to the Taliban that evening, as police in three outposts around the prison hunkered down behind their fortifications and refused to intervene.

Local and foreign intelligence agencies also failed to understand glaring signs of trouble at the jail in the weeks before the attack, including a mass poisoning of prison guards just eight days beforehand. Taliban fighters warned local shopkeepers about an impending battle in the hours before they struck, but nobody passed the warning to the correct authorities.

Corruption likely helped the Taliban that night, too, as some indications have implicated a senior Afghan official in the jailbreak planning.

Sifting through the rubble at Sarpoza prison, it’s obvious that the attack was not just a successful Taliban operation. It was a failure of the institutions that protect Kandahar city, despite the Canadian money and lives expended to build a zone of security here in the past two years.

Three of the city’s top Afghan security officials have been fired in the aftermath of the jailbreak, and the prison director has been arrested. A review by Afghanistan’s intelligence service concluded that the prison needed more guards, better weapons and stronger fortifications. But the lessons of Sarpoza may prove more fundamental, pointing to the fragility of the international efforts in Afghanistan.

The last time residents of Kandahar city heard rumours about a possible jailbreak was two years ago, in the summer of 2006. Insurgents had been digging trenches and establishing bases in the village of Pashmul, 15 kilometres west of the city limits. The whispers among insurgents suggested plans for a Taliban inmate to fake an illness, allowing an ambulance full of gunmen to slip through the heavy black gates of the prison compound. With the insurgents already operating so close to the edge of the city, the threat seemed credible.

But the attack never happened, possibly because Canadian troops and their allies smashed the Taliban’s bases in Pashmul with a massive offensive in September of 2006.

Two years later, however, the Taliban had again established a foothold 15 kilometres outside the city, this time directly south of the prison in a cluster of villages known as the Nakhonay triangle. Canadian troops had known for months that insurgents were massing in Nakhonay, with Taliban reportedly enforcing their own laws and using the area as a staging ground for operations. But the Canadians lacked the troops necessary to set up permanent security in those villages. The Taliban would exploit the security vacuum in the Nakhonay area on June 13, entering and leaving through the farmland south of the prison.

But the Canadians could not be accused of neglecting the prison itself. One of the key tenets of “clear, hold, and build,” as a method of counterinsurgency is the idea that investing money and improving the lives in a particular spot will make the locals more likely to deliver useful intelligence. By that measure, the guards and prisoners at Sarpoza should have been excellent sources for the Canadians, who had been pouring money into the jail.

In the year before the prison break, the Canadians paid for new septic systems, solar-powered lighting, new doors and windows, an infirmary, landscaping, guard towers and washroom facilities, among other improvements. Painted walls replaced the rough stone surfaces; where chunks of masonry used to fall on prisoners as they slept, the ceilings now arched smoothly.

The current budget for all prison upgrades stands at $4-million, and Canadian officials visited the jail regularly to check on the progress.

Despite the Canadians’ focus on the prison, however, they failed to understand the trouble brewing inside.

A report by the U.S. magazine Newsweek claimed that the planning started when a disgruntled prisoner telephoned insurgent leader Mullah Berader and complained about prison conditions, but that story was dismissed by Taliban spokesman Qari Yousef Ahmadi.

“The Taliban in jail were always calling us, asking us to release them,” Mr. Ahmadi said. “Especially our commanders who were sentenced to 20 years or execution.”

Several sources say the planning started in earnest after accused Taliban prisoners launched a hunger strike in May, trying to obtain sentences in cases that remained undecided. Some suspected insurgents had languished in the prison for years without a conviction, and they described themselves as frustrated with a justice process that they claimed was designed to keep them in jail indefinitely.

They struck a committee of seven Taliban prisoners, who gathered every day inside one of the nicest cells of the national-security wing, a sunny room on the north side with a view of a garden.

They posted a sign on their door, saying: “No interruptions from 4 p.m. to 6 p.m.”

Prison officials say a few members of the prisoners’ committee also held regular meetings, in private, with prison director Colonel Abdul Qadir. It’s not known what they discussed; one of the prison officials who helped arrange the meetings was shot in the head during the jailbreak, and Col. Qadir was arrested soon afterward.

An insurgent who escaped, a 28-year-old father of two children who didn’t want his name published, said the Taliban planners were helped by jail officials.

Important officials from the jail helped us bring in pistols and mobile phones, and we also bought some explosives for the bombing,” the fugitive said.

The same cell where prison officials believe the Taliban held their afternoon planning meetings contained an Arabic phrase recently painted on the wall: “Jihad is mandatory.” The accused Taliban in that cell sometimes imposed their religious fervour on fellow inmates, giving long speeches about Islam in the evenings, refusing to allow any disrespect toward Taliban supreme leader Mullah Mohammed Omar and enforcing early wake-up times for morning prayers.

Their room also had a view of the jail’s central guard tower, and prison officials say they used at least one smuggled handgun to open fire on the tower during the jailbreak. Brass casings remain on the cell floor. None of the guards in the tower were killed or injured, but the gunfire coming from that corner of the prison may have resulted in the initial false reports that Taliban had breached the prison’s north wall.

No matter how suspicious the behaviour of the Taliban inmates at the time, Gen. Thompson said it would have been difficult for the Canadians to notice.

“If there are Taliban holding little meetings and they’ve struck some kind of agreement with the warden, if that was in fact the case, I don’t think we’d be aware of it unless the warden saw fit to share it with us,” he said.

The Canadian commander said he was also unaware, until informed by The Globe and Mail, that most of the prison staff had been poisoned in the week before the attack.

Rahim Bibi, 40, superintendent of the women’s section, said one bite of the mutton stew was enough to tell her something was wrong when she sat down with other guards and a few prisoners for an evening meal on June 5. The meat tasted bitter, like tobacco. Soon at least 25 people at the dinner were vomiting. Some bled from the nose and mouth, and fell unconscious. Many were hospitalized and the rest staggered home, leaving only a few guards on duty that evening.

It’s unclear why the poisoning happened, and prison officials say it was never properly investigated. Like the other staff, Ms. Bibi recovered from the poisoning and returned to work. She didn’t notice anything else unusual, she said, until she had a puzzling conversation with the prison director on the day of the attack. She passed him outside his office, she said, and he smiled at her.

“He told me, ‘Something might happen tonight,’ ” Ms. Bibi said. “He said, ‘If any of the prisoners owes you money, collect it. If you owe them money, pay it.’ ” In the hours before the bombing, others in the neighbourhood also received warnings. Insurgents visited shops and a gas pump near the prison, telling people to evacuate the area because of an impending attack. The tactic was effective: Only one civilian, who worked at a bakery, was confirmed killed in the subsequent bombing. Apparently nobody passed the warning to police, or the information was never acted on.

“Why didn’t the people call the government? Because the people are afraid of the government,” said Haji Ehsan, a provincial council member.

The first explosions and gunfire erupted around 9:10 p.m., witnesses say, as insurgents attacked the Dand Chowk police checkpoint about 600 metres east of the prison and the Gendama police barracks about 2,200 metres to the west, hitting the two nearest positions held by Afghan forces and keeping them away from the prison for the next hour.

Sardar Mohammed, the police captain responsible for the eight officers at Dand Chowk, said his men were pinned down behind their sandbags for half an hour, and even after reinforcements arrived, they only managed to take up positions a dozen metres further toward the prison.

“Mostly we fired our rifles in the dark,” he said.

At the same time as the two checkpoint attacks, a fuel tanker rolled up to Sarpoza’s main gate. The driver appeared nervous, and he ran away. Guards fired in the direction of the fleeing insurgent, but he escaped; the Taliban later claimed the suicide bomb had a defective switch.

Moments later, at about 9:18 or 9:19 p.m., two rocket-propelled grenades whistled out of the darkness. The first shot missed the tanker but the second ignited a massive explosion. Witnesses describe a shock wave so powerful that it knocked out windows a kilometre away, and a large ball of white light rose momentarily over the west side of Kandahar city. Four guards in the gate towers were killed instantly.

The remaining guards offered little resistance as the Taliban charged through the haze of dust and falling debris. Gunfire came from only one of five guard towers. A guard was blasted into pieces by a rocket-propelled grenade as he took cover underneath a water tower.

Three more were shot to death along the corridor that leads into the heart of the prison. The Taliban went straight for the national-security wing, shooting the locks off the prison gates with a belt-fed machine gun at close range.

A few insurgents went a short distance along the rows of Taliban cells and distributed weapons to comrades, shouting at them to escape quickly. Cell doors in the wing are required to be locked by nightfall, but the Taliban timed their strike just minutes before the guards made their evening rounds; one escaped insurgent said a group of ringleaders hiding in the bathroom had given precise timing to the jailbreakers using smuggled cellphones.

More contraband cellphones appeared in the hands of inmates after the first moments of the attack, witnesses said, describing a chorus of men shouting into their handsets: “God is great!”

An insurgent who participated in the jailbreak said the Taliban leaders had a short argument after opening the national-security wing, because they disagreed about whether to set free the jail’s criminals, but eventually decided to open all the locks.

Meanwhile, outside the jail, other insurgents were distracting the security forces with several small gun battles inside the city. At one point, a Western observer counted six simultaneous gun battles in the downtown.

“They kept us busy,” said Dost Mohammed, 23, a policeman. “We could hear shooting in many places in town, and we were afraid.”

The confusion was equally frightening for most of the prisoners. Bashir Ahmad, 19, said he followed the Taliban’s orders to get out of the prison, and was confronted by an insurgent commander near the gate who wore a pakool hat and spoke with an accent that suggested he was not native to Kandahar. The commander had a scarf wrapped around his entire head, he said, with only his left eye showing.

He gave us a choice: Fight along with the Taliban, or go home,” Mr. Ahmad said. “Many of us wanted to go home, so they divided us into groups of 100 or 200. They appointed a Taliban commander for each group, and each group had a few Taliban guards.”

The insurgents shepherded the groups of escapees down narrow alleyways, through vineyards, and across streams. When they heard aircraft, they took cover under trees or lay down in fields of wheat.

Mr. Ahmad’s group spent the night camped in a village about 12 kilometres south of the prison, but others didn’t go as far, flopping down to sleep one or two kilometres away from the scene of the jailbreak.

Many of them expected the government or foreign troops to chase them, and expressed amazement at the lack of pursuers. Canada’s Quick Reaction Force, deployed from Camp Nathan Smith about six kilometres away, was seen by one Western observer arriving at Sarpoza around 11 p.m., after the shooting had stopped.

Roughly 400 Taliban escaped the national-security wing, and only three were recaptured.

“I thought that there would be big fighting, aerial bombardments, and many Taliban would be killed some arrested,” said a Taliban fighter, now enjoying freedom with his family in Kandahar city. “But when we reached our safe houses we were surprised, because there was no fighting, nothing.”

He added: “I didn’t think we would succeed like we did.”

How come the Mujaahideen do not fight alongside the Shi’a in ‘Iraaq? May 23, 2008

Posted by revolution in : 'Irāq, Deviants, Islāmic State of 'Irāq, Jihād, Knowledge, Sects, miraculous , 5 comments

This question is constantly asked amongst both Muslims and Kuffaar. Why can’t the two put their differences aside and unite against the common enemy? And usually, when they are referring to the Shi’a, they are referring to the Raafida (who are Kaafir) and not the Zaydi’s (who are not Kaafir).

Here are the following reasons:

1. Do your personal research on the ‘Aqeedah of the Raafida, and the Shi’a sect in general. This is the first step. Mind you, our difference with them is not only on issues like Mut’a (temporary marriage), the Day of ‘Ashurah (as pictured above) and the whole issue of ‘Ali (radiyallahu ‘anhu) being the Caliph. It goes much deeper than this and it involves Shirk, Kufr al-Akbar and extreme Bid’ah.

2. Do your research on what the Qur’aan, Sunnah and the Salaf have to say about Apostates, and Deviants and what our relationship with them should be like. Should it be one of unity or one of disavowal? Are there any exceptions? Does Allah love them or hate them? This is the most important point and we cannot emphasize this enough. In order to deal with a certain people, you have to - and you have no option but to - follow what the Shari’ah allows you to do and doesn’t allow you to do. It’s a simple issue of obeying Allah and His Messenger and whoever throws this aside is following his whims and desires over the Haqq. And to Allah alone is the Reckoning.

3. Once this is all done, then start to do some research on what the current day Shi’a are doing to Ahl as-Sunnah in ‘Iraaq (since this issue is mainly focused on ‘Iraaq). Study the oppression, murdering, and rape incidents of the “Shi’a death squads.” Quite a few documentaries, articles and books have appeared on them. You will come to realize that their ‘Aqeedah allows for them to oppress Ahl as-Sunnah and it allows them to practice taqiyyah (deception) when it comes to almost anything, including unity. The point is, they can justify it with their texts and you will stand helpless. One minute they are smiling with you about unity and the next, they stab your back by either killing you or insulting the Sahaabah.

4. Some will try to bring examples and “logic” to you in order to justify unity with these Kuffaar whom Allah hates. For instance, they will say, “There is an extreme crisis in ‘Iraaq. It’s like a Tsunami. It doesn’t matter who is Murtad, Shi’a or Kaafir, you’ll do whatever you can to save the person!” The response to this is, “No, it is not as much of a crisis as you make it to be. It’s not like people are being killed all around you 24/7 by constant bombs, rockets, bullets and whatnot, but rather this is guerrilla warfare which will last for a long time and Allah is with those who have Sabr. The situation is a lot more calmer, Alhamdullilaah, than what you have described. So please do not use logic or examples against the aayaat and ahaadeeth regarding our relationship with the Apostates and Kuffaar. What Qur’aan and Sunnah says is what goes. And even if we were to be in such a crisis as you have stated, then even if we knew that a Shi’a is drowning, we wouldn’t save him. We would interpret that incident as his humiliation and punishment for his Apostasy; and if a believer drowns, it is one of the degrees of Shahaadah according to a hadeeth.”

5. How can we fight alongside the Shi’a when the end goals will be totally different? Ahl as-Sunnah wants to establish the Shari’ah based on Qur’aan and Sunnah according to the Salaf, and the Shi’a want to establish their version of Shari’ah based on their corrupted desires and ‘Aqeedah of Apostasy. There will only be chaos at the end. Under the Khilaafah, either the Shi’a will be forced to leave or they will pay the Jizyah. This is because they are Apostates and we treat them according to the ruling in the Shari’ah because we take the Shari’ah as the highest source and priority and guidance in our lives rather than our “hikmah” and “rational.”

6. The Shi’a (in this case, Jaysh al-Mahdi) will simply be treated as a second enemy; the first being the Crusaders and the Murtadeen who support them.

7. Some say that the Americans have instigated this conflict between Ahl as-Sunnah and the Shi’a. The fact of the matter is that this is not entirely true. The Shi’a death squads were active in their murder, oppression and rape against Ahl as-Sunnah before the Americans started to gain ground in ‘Iraaq. This is when Imaam al-Zarqawi, rahimahullah, took a firm stance against them and showed them harshness which made the Shi’a fear for their lives when they heard his name or knew his Mujaahideen were in town.

Eventually, the Americans did create conflict between us and the Shi’a by bombing the marketplaces and such using the tactic of false-flag operations, and Alhamdullilaah, this led to major battles between the people of Haqq and the people of Baatil. From the perspective of Ahl as-Sunnah, this woke up the great majority of the Sunni Muslims into realizing who the Shi’a are; they are a people who fight Ahl as-Sunnah based on false and improperly researched rumors as if they were willing to kill and annihilate us in any case; their finger was already on the trigger so to say. So the battle has become clearer for the people of Haqq; Allah has revealed to us who are our enemies are and who our allies are; whom we can trust and whom we cannot trust.

And all the praises and thanks belong to Allah alone.

8. For those who have insight, they will realize that it is not permissible to unite with those who curse the Sahaabah, insult Allah Ta’aala with their Shirk and Kufr al-Akbar, and insult Rasoolullah (sallallahu ‘alayhi wassallam) and the rest of the Ummah with their extreme bid’ah in the name of Islaam. The Salaf have told us that it is not permissible to pray behind them due to their disbelief and to even give them Salaam’s due their their extreme and ugly Apostasy. So how can one have unity with them in any shape or form, especially in the fields of Jihaad - which is meant for pure and lofty goals of making the word of Allah Supreme and the word of disbelief low and humiliated?

The matter is clear and we must support the Islaamic State of ‘Iraaq in their pure Jihaad against the Crusaders, the Murtadoon and the hostile Shi’as. Before you speak about unity, go learn your Deen and see what your Deen allows in the unity and what it rejects.

Why do we call all disbelievers as Kaafir?

Posted by revolution in : Knowledge, miraculous , 26 comments

In the ‘Aqeedah of Ahlus Sunnah, every disbeliever is a Kaafir and whoever does not call a disbeliever a Kaafir is a Kaafir himself. The evidences for this ruling are solid and numerous, and many Shuyookh of Ahlus Sunnah - both classical and contemporary - have discussed these evidences in great detail.

But here, we would like to briefly discuss: what is the purpose of calling a disbeliever a Kaafir?

Interestingly, this is a question the disbelievers themselves want to know since they see the word Kaafir as derogatory and whatnot.

The purpose of calling a Kaafir as a Kaafir is for the following reasons:

1. To show them harshness.

2. To avoid their gatherings.

3. To reject their Religion/Deen/Millah.

4. To give them Da’wah to Tawheed.

5. To treat them as enemies of Allah until they become Muslim.

There are a few more reasons, but this is good enough for now. Let’s discuss each of these briefly.

(more…)

From the signs of Allah: An elephant that can paint a portrait of itself April 1, 2008

Posted by revolution in : Videos, miraculous , 4 comments

SubhaanAllaah, can you believe that Allah has given an elephant the ability to paint a portrait of itself on paper? Indeed Allah Ta’aala can do anything, and there are signs in this for those who reflect.

To watch the video, click here.

For more information, click here.

Allah says:

Behold! in the creation of the heavens and the earth; in the alternation of the night and the day; in the sailing of the ships through the ocean for the profit of mankind; in the rain which Allah Sends down from the skies, and the life which He gives therewith to an earth that is dead; in the beasts of all kinds that He scatters through the earth; in the change of the winds, and the clouds which they Trail like their slaves between the sky and the earth;- (Here) indeed are Signs for a people that are wise.

Yet there are men who take (for worship) others besides Allah, as equal (with Allah): They love them as they should love Allah. But those of Faith are overflowing in their love for Allah. If only the unrighteous could see, behold, they would see the penalty: that to Allah belongs all power, and Allah will strongly enforce the penalty. (2:164-65)

Bad Behavior has blocked 1476 access attempts in the last 7 days.