Yousef al-Khattab: Mumbai Attack Due to USA & British Foreign Policy? November 28, 2008
Posted by revolution in : India, Political Analysis, Videos , 2 comments
Masha’Allah, the brother took the words out of my mouth.
To watch, click here.
To leave a comment on his site, click here.
Bhutto didn’t mean to say “Usamah bin Ladin” November 17, 2008
Posted by revolution in : Political Analysis, Videos , 1 comment so farThe following is a video explaining Bhutto’s mistake of using Shaykh Usamah’s name in the context of him being killed; she meant to say Daniel Pearl was killed.
EDIT: we add this here to prove to those Muslims who use this to say that Shaykh Usamah is dead that it was a simple mistake on her behalf.
To watch, click here.
Shaykh Imran Hosein on Obama’s victory, Dajjal’s appearance & what lies ahead November 8, 2008
Posted by revolution in : Political Analysis, True Shuyūkh, United States of Losers , 14 comments
The following is an E-mail sent out by the Shaykh, Imran Hosein - hafidhullah - who gives some interesting analysis as to Obama’s victory and what lies ahead:
Assalaamu ‘alaikum!
The financial/monetary summit which is now being arranged is certainly linked to Dajjal’s phase three.
It is through a study of events which led to the passage from Dajjal’s phase one to phase two that we can anticipate and recognize events now unfolding, and soon to unfold in the historical process, which would indicate the passage to phase three.
We have long anticipated that the creation of a new international monetary system to replace the tottering Bretton Woods Accord would be precisely such a sign.
We must now look carefully to seek to recognize what is still carefully concealed evidence that would confirm the transfer of the world’s financial capital from Washington to Jerusalem.
We must also anticipate that great wars would also erupt in which Israel would display its military superiority over the rest of the world - including UK and USA.
Not only does Obama’s election as US President now ‘whitewash’ a terribly-soiled US image in the world, but it also allows the cabal to exploit his commitment to widen the war in Afghanistan to their advantage. It is therefore a black Obama administration that would be led by the nose to attack Pakistan’s nuclear facilities (perhaps in concert with an Indian attack on Pakistan) while Israel exploits the opportunity to simultaneously attack Iran’s nuclear plants. The immediate result of such a war would be the astronomical rise in the price of both oil and gold and the consequent total collapse of the US dollar and the US economy in such wise as would cripple the Democratic Party for decades to come.
John McCain’s concession speech indicates that he (as well as the leadership of the Republican Party) are well aware that they have led Obama/Afro-America/the Democratic Party down a path to be sacrificed and slaughtered as a cow. Obama and the Afro-Americans have displayed complete innocence of the fact that they could never have succeeded unless the white cabal had made the choice to have a black man elected as President.
It was not by accident that the present phase of the financial meltdown commenced in early September and immediately impacted on the contest for the White House in a manner that eventually assured victory for Obama.
Imran N Hosein
For those who are not aware of Shaykh Imran’s views, he believes that in order for Dajjal to appear as an individual, the United States Economy has to collapse and the status of “superpower” has to be transferred to the State of Israel; he bases this off of a few Sahih Ahadeeth pertaining to Dajjal, namely the hadeeth regarding the “40 days.” Ever since he made his predictions regarding Dajjal and how he must come, he’s been on track and it is likely to go in that direction considering the events unfolding in front of our very eyes. It is an interesting and refreshing view that many are not used to; if you’re interested on how he reached those conclusions, you can read his book, “Jerusalem in the Qur’an.”
Wallahu ‘Alam.
On Historic Change November 7, 2008
Posted by revolution in : Blogger, Political Analysis, United States of Losers , 8 commentsThe following is a post by Br. Jinnzaman; although we may have some disagreements with our beloved brother, nevertheless it is an important read for all those Muslims that voted in this year’s elections.
On Historic Change
Unfortunately, many American Muslims have gotten caught up in the hype surrounding Obama’s overwhelming victory in the Presidential election. While this is no doubt an important event that saw the most extreme fringe of conservativism bubble up and get defeated, it is a bit of an exaggeration to call this “historic change”, especially coming from a Muslim perspective. Islam has no issues with race. There have been many rulers in Islamic history that have been Black (Shaykh Uthman Dan Fodio, Mansa Musa). Those American Muslims who are not African Americans experienced very little of the torments of slavery, jim crow laws, and racism. Nor has Obama’s relationship with Muslims been praiseworthy, if anything, he’s given the community a cold shoulder. His response to claims about him being Muslim were muted and focused more on refuting the claim than pointing out that being Muslim was irrelevant. The only person to take a firm stance against the charge of Obama being Muslim was Colin Powell, a Republican of all people. During the entire course of his campaign, Obama failed to visit a single Masjid or met with any Muslim leadership at all, as opposed to his visits to countless Churches, synagogues, and lets not fail to mention his “historic” visit to AIPAC.
Obama has flip flopped on various positions just during the course of his campaign, unlike George Bush who waited until after he was a president to do so. Obama made a promise that if John McCain opted to use public financing for his campaign, he would do so. When McCain did so, Obama reneged on his promise. Obama’s views on energy have also flip flopped. In terms of his views on warfare, while it is true that he wants to withdraw from Iraq, he has stated his willingness to increase troops in Afghanistan, to fight covert missions in Pakistan, and perhaps even to intervene in Sudan. The fact that his foreign policy adviser during his campaign was Zbignieuw Brzenzinski, the mastermind behind the Afghan jihad against the Soviets and his first nomination was Rahm Emmanuel, the son of an Irgun terrorist who went out of his way to volunteer in the Israeli military as a civilian to defend it during the Gulf War illustrates exactly major issues in his foreign policy objectives. Let’s also not forget his proclamation that Jerusalem should be the undivided capital of Israel, in spite of the historic claim of Palestinians. He has even gone so far as to support Israeli plans to take out Syrian nuclear reactors.
The only thing that has changed about the nature of power in America is purely a cosmetic one. The ruling class now has a black man as its puppet to lull the masses into sleep and to not question the structure of class and power relationships in America. The danger behind idealizing Obama is that those who participate in a personality cult around him will fail to see his flaws. In fact, his flaws are already apparent now and American Muslims are either denying them or ignoring them. If they continue on the path of giving blind devotion to someone who simply does not care about them, they are setting themselves up for a rude awakening that will result in widespread disillusionment that may foster extremism, just as the election of George Bush did in 2000. If Obama continues business as usual, young American Muslims may find themselves asking “If a liberal progressive such as Obama has the same foreign policy objectives as George Bush, than perhaps there is no hope for real change at all?” This path of blind faith and hope will just as easily transform into one of anger and desperation, perhaps even eventually violence. Their failure lies not in their audacity to hope and dream, but for having unrealistic expectations of how the American political system operates. They have failed to understand how the Constitution is structured with anti-majoritarian constraints setting up an electoral college that sets up a bipartisan system which enables corporations and special interests to funnel wealth in favor of candidates.
If one looks at Obama’s nomination for the Chief of Staff, Rahm Emmanuel, the power of money, not ideas, becomes apparent. Rahm Emmanuel was behind the victory of Clinton and the Democratic takeover in the 2006 midterm elections. He did so through raising record numbers of funding, the same thing that Obama did in this campaign. Let it not be forgotten that if Obama had opted to go through public campaign financing as he promised, then the amount of money he would have gotten for his campaign would have been significantly less and the outcome of the election may have been radically different. American Muslims fail to realize that their is a price that comes with the campaign contributions from wealthy individuals and organizations and that is ideology. It is strange for Obama to have protested against apartheid in South Africa as a student but not protest against the apartheid committed by the Israelis against the Palestinians. What is the cause of this inconsistency? Is it a failure of vision or ignorance of the situation of the Palestinians? No, it is an intentional denial of the suffering of those people because he received a huge amount of funding from American Zionists. So to be clear, this election is not historic change for American Muslims, especially for someone. The American hegemonic system continues to operate both within the state and between it and other states. The structure of power and class relations remains unchanged and even if Obama intended to do so, he would not be able to do so without the support of his party in Congress and without the Supreme Court which is presently dominated by conservatives. Any gross deviance from the bipartisan agenda would spell disaster for the Democrats so they are forced to support a more centrist agenda, just as Obama is forced by similar pressures to going along with the party line.
Until American Muslims study the structure of power and economics in America as set up by the Constitution, they will continue to give almost fanatical reverence to people who care nothing for them and will continue to trample on their interests. However, this post was not intended to demoralize the American Muslim community. It was intended to give them a realistic portrayal so that they do not end up hurting themselves when their aspirations get dashed. It was intended to remind them that historic change comes in many forms, not just in the form of US Presidential elections. The first and foremost historic change was not Obama’s victory into the white house, but the birth of our beloved Prophet (salahu alayhi wa sallam), the mercy to all of creation. Nothing is more historic and great as that. Historic change is when a group of backwards Arabs who knew nothing of culture or civilization were able to establish a military power that would dominate world affairs for the rest of history, even until today. Historic change is when the Ottoman Empire sent its forces to every part of the Muslim world to defeat Western expansion even though they got little in return. They sent aid and soldiers to North Africa, Egypt, the Gulf states, India, and even as far off as Indonesia. Such a sign of brotherhood and lover for one’s fellow Muslims only occurred during the era of the Sahabah (radhi allahu anhum). May Allah (subhana wa ta’ala) grant the Ottoman sultans and mujahideen janat al firdaus. Ameen.
Of course, one doesn’t have to look that far back into history to look for historic change, look at this century alone and the collapse of colonialism. To me, the collapse of colonialism is a far more significant event than the election of a Black man as president. Racism is only one facet of the problem of hegemony, the other being the structure of power being transformed between the colonizer and the colonized. When nations across the world rebelled against their occupiers and were granted independence either by sword or pen, that is true historic change. Why don’t Muslims speak about colonialism and the struggles of the many brave people who gave their lives in resisting it? Is the resistance of Omar Mukhtar not historic change? Is not the Mutiny of 1857 in India not historic change? Is not the rebellion year after year after year against the Dutch in Southeast Asia not historic change? Is not Nasser’s nationalization of the Suez canal not historic change? Is not the Islamic revolution of Iran in 1979 not historic change? Is not the decision by OPEC to institute an oil embargo not historic change? Is not the defeat of the USSR, a superpower, by a handful of scraggly bearded fundamentalists not historic change? If these things are not historic change, than what is historic change? Are Muslims so enslaved that they interpret a victory for the ruling class in America as a victory of their own while ignoring their rich history of resistance and struggle for sovereignty? Are we that brainwashed that the election of a person who has no connection to our religion and has openly supported the oppression of our people is categorized as a “historic event”? In my opinion, Ho Chi Minh is a better source of inspiration that Barack Obama. Ho Chi Minh attended the Treaty of Versailles attempting to convince Woodrow Wilson to recognize Vietnamese self-determination, a philosophy that the latter had announced was a right for all nations. Wilson, in contrast to his pronounced idealism, had two weeks earlier authorized a military expedition to invade Haiti and install a puppet of his choosing. During the entirety of Wilson’s campaigning for his fourteen points, American troops occupied Nicaragua. A person who is not fooled by the promises of politicians and high idealism would instantly be able to point out the contradictions of a President supporting the right of self-determination for nations while virtually simultaneously trampling on the rights of such peoples in his own backyard. American Muslims do not see these contradictions with Barack Obama because they are blinded by a dazzling media campaign and cheap slogans. We’ve shifted from cheap slogans like “Quran and Sunnah”, “Islam is the only solution,” and “the importance of Muslim unity” to “change you can believe in.”
The only change Muslims should believe in is the change that Allah (subhana wa ta’ala) bestows upon the Ummah after they themselves have changed what is in their hearts. Instead of looking to Barack Obama, who will probably turn out to be another Woodrow Wilson, perhaps American Muslims should look to Ho Chi Minh. After Minh had left the Treaty of Versailles conference in disappointment, what did he do? Did he try to go to the Republican presidential candidate in the next election and try to influence him? No. Did he try to go to the leader of another Western state and attempt to woo them over? No. He became a communist, went to the USSR to receive training in revolutionary organization, and then went back to his country and fought for its liberation against the Japanese, French, and finally the Americans. The defeat of the world’s greatest superpower by an old pastry chef is historic change. The resolution and willpower of the Vietnamese people to fight for their independence at all costs is historic change. American Muslims would learn more from the revolutionary movements that resulted in the global demise of colonialism than they would from the US presidential elections. They would learn their own proud history of resistance. They would learn that if you want change, you work for it yourself. They would learn that power does not come from groveling on your knees before powerful people like Firawn, but from standing up boldly on your feet and demanding it. They would learn that the only means to solving the problems of the global Muslim brotherhood, of which the American Muslim community is inextricably connected no matter how much they choose to ignore or deny this, is by organizing ourselves by embracing a revolutionary methodology. It is by pooling our political systems, economic wealth and resources, and military powers will true historic change come. The problem of Palestine was created by Western states such as England, France, and America who have a vested interest in the energy rich region, they will not solve that problem because it would spell suicide for their hegemonic interests. The situation of Palestine can only be solved when the Muslim world adopts the spirit of the Intifada. The suffering of Iraqis, Afghanis, Kashmiris, Uighurs, Chechens, and Somalis would not be happening if the Muslim Ummah was working for real historic change, rather than being duped by cosmetic changes. It is not within the character of the believer to grovel for scraps of power from oppressors and elites. Those who do so will share in their eventual humiliation. The only way to victory for the Muslim world is by banding together, implementing Khilafah and the Shari’ah, and working towards promoting the interests of Islam.
12 Reasons to Watch Carefully to Obama as President of the United States November 6, 2008
Posted by revolution in : Political Analysis, True Journalism, United States of Losers , 2 commentsThe Zionists and civilian militarist control Obama’s overall war politics regarding the Middle East. There won’t be a chance for peace in Iran, Palestine, Pakistan, Afghanistan or Iraq. Wall Street controls Obama’s financial politics: There won’t be any space to some progressist from Cambridge to introduce alms for the families losing their house.
Now that Barack Obama has won the presidency of the United States of America, it is imperative that all of us hold him accountable for any of the following political actions that he is verily likely to take that could be contrary to anything he has promised during his campaign and that will put at risk even more our freedoms, prosperity and the need of unity this country needs.
Presidential elections in the United States, have once again, brought a test fire to the integrity and behavior of intellectuals in the US. It is a duty and intellectual responsibility of the public to tell the truth to the power, the latest statements from most of our most renowned scholars with more prestige have failed miserably. Instead of unfold, unmask and denounce the reactionary home and international policies of the Democrat Candidate, Senator Barack Obama, they have preferred to support him, “in a critical way, by offering excuses such as “limited differences” could be taken as positive, and that “Obama is a minor evil” and “creates the possibility of a change”.
What makes this argument unsustainable is the fact that public statements of Obama, his main advisors in politics and the ones which probably configure his policies from the presidential seat have outlined openly a foreign policy highly bellicose and a home policy deeply reactionary, totally in line with Paulson-Bush-Wall Street. In regard to the main topics about war, peace, financial crisis and the savagery exercised over the salaried class in the United States, Obama promises to enlarge and intensify the policies most Americans reject and repudiate.
12 Reasons to Reject Obama
1. - Expansion of Military Aggression Abroad
Obama promises repeatedly and publicly intensify the US military intervention in Afghanistan, increasing the number of American soldiers, expanding their operations and participating in systematical Tran-bordering attacks. In other words, Obama is a major bellicose worst than Bush.
2. - Pakistan under menace under the scam of “War on Terror”
Obama has declared publicly that his regime will intensify the “war on terror” by the means of terrestrial and air attacks at large scale on Pakistan, thus involving all villages and cities considered favorable to afghan resistance.
3. - Obama opposes the withdrawal of American forces from Iraq
He prefers the reallocation from combat zones to places for training and logistics, depending on the capabilities of the Iraqi army to defeat the armed resistance. Obama opposes to give a deadline for the withdrawal of American forces from Iraq since they are essential to pursue his global policies in the Middle East which include military confrontations against Iran and Syria, and the south of Lebanon.
4. - Obama’s unconditional support to Pro-Israeli Lobby
Obama has declare his full support to pro-Israeli lobby and bellicose, expansionist and colonialist policies from the Jewish State. He has promises to support Israeli military attacks, no matter the cost for the USA. His despicable servility to Israel was more clearly during his speech at the Annual AIPAC meeting held in Washington this year. His main advisors, with significant and ancient ties to the highest hierarchies of the Zionist factories of propaganda and with the presidents of the principal Jewish American organizations who wrote the speech and that make his policy for the Middle East.
5. - Obama’s threat to attack Iran
In two occasions, just some weeks earlier to the election day, Joe Biden indicated with absolute clarity some “points of conflict” (Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Russia and North Korea), recalling that Obama will “respond with strength”. Obama’s High Ranked Advisors for the Middle East include well known Zionists like Dennis Ross, very close to the “Center for Bipartisan Policy”, which published a report that outlines a detailed action program for a war against Iran. The proposal from Obama to negotiate with Iran is nothing more than an excuse to give an ultimatum to Iran: The surrender of Iran’s sovereignty or a monumental military aggression.
6. - Obama’s full support for the Total Expulsion of Palestinians from Cisjordania
Besides the expansion of new settlements in Cisjordania, the main reason for the hostility there is in the Middle East, of war and the discredit of the American policy in that region. With dozens of people that set Israel as a priority between his main campaign managers, political advisors, speech writers and probably the candidates for a seat in the government, there is practically no hope to “influence from the inside” or to “apply popular pressure” with the end of changing the servility submission from Obama to the Zionist power. By supporting Obama, the “progressist intellectuals” are, in fact, allies from their Zionist mentors
7. - Obama’s unquestioned support to Wall Street Bailout
Regarding to his national policy, Obama’s key economic advisors have flawless credentials from Wall Street. He approved without questioning and immediately the bailout, with taxpayer money, proposed by the US Treasure Secretary Paulson, for $700 billion to the wealthiest investment banks of the United States. Obama has not questioned nor Paulson neither the Banks for the use of these federal funds destined to bailout and acquire other banks instead of issuing credits to manufacturers and families that have to pay for their house. Obama’s supports to Paulson and to the Wall Street bailout are equal to his greedy proposals to suspend all the foreclosures during three months, pending for the renegotiation of interests. Obama proposes to intensify the government fund transfers to wrongly managed financial institutions and capitalist corporations in bankruptcy with the goal to save a failed capitalism instead of seek the instauration of new long term public investment programs at large scale that generate well paid jobs for the workers.
8. - His NO to Free market intervention in public assistance
Obama’s economic teams has openly embraced and practiced the “free market” ideology and opposed any important injection of federal funds to the productive activity of public property and social services and thus face the failed private sector, corruption and general collapse.
9. - Obama’s embraces failed private health plans
He supports the greedy insurance corporations, the conservative medical and hospital associations and the big pharmaceuticals. He rejects publicly an universal national health program based on the successful federal program of Medicare to favor private sector plans oriented to maximum profits and subsidized by the government just to provide a inefficient, expensive and out of the reach of more than one third of American families.
10.- Obama’s defense of Big Farm companies
Also he favors the highly subsidized and profitable ethanol manufacturers. This program has increased food prices to millions of Americans and hundreds of millions of people around the world.
11. - Obama also favors the hegemonic might in Latin American affairs
Obama supports the defense of the continuation of the criminal embargo to Cuba, the hostile confrontation with the populist President of Venezuela, Hugo Chavez, and against other reformers in Latin America, his tricky policy to promote protectionism for America and the free market access in Latin America. His most important advisors on Latin American affairs propose cosmetic changes in the style and diplomacy, but implacable support to the US hegemony.
12. - Obama has no plan to end recession
He has not proposed any and nor his advisors of free market and his billionaire financial partisans any strategic comprehensive plan to get us out of a recession that deepens more and more. On the contrary, the series of fragmented measures presented by Obama is inconsistent with reality: Fiscal austerity is incompatible with the creation of new jobs; the Wall Street bailout diverts necessary funds for public productive investment; and the prosecution of new wars undermines domestic recovery.
Conclusion
Intellectuals, who, in the name of “realism”, support a politician that openly and publicly embraces new wars, millionaire bailouts with profit ends, health programs managed by the private sector, contradict his own demands as “responsible critics”.
They what C. Wright Mills called “Realistic Nuts” surrounding their responsibility as critic intellectuals. When seeming to support the “minor evil”, they promote the “major evil”: The continuation, during four more years, of great recession, colonial wars and popular alienation.
Even more, they allies of the big media outlets, of the mighty political parties and the legal system that has marginalized when not even openly excluded their alternative candidates, Ralph Nader and Cynthia McKinney, who they do truly speak clearly and oppose war, bailouts and propose the real public investment at large scale in the domestic economy, a universal health care program backed by one only fund, sustainable economic policies that protect our environment and redistributive policies of incomes in the long run at large scale.
What is fool and unacceptable is the argument that these intellectuals (who represent an insignificant grain in the Democrat donkey ass) that their “critic support” of Obama’s political machine will open space where radical ideas fit. Zionists and civilian military control absolutely the war policies of Barack Obama in the Middle East. There will be no room for Peace in Iran, Palestine, Pakistan or Iraq. Wall Street controls his financial policies: There will be no room for any progressist from Cambridge to introduce a alms for families loosing their home.
If the multimillionaire association treasuries that have spent hundreds of millions of dollars in each presidential campaign have not gotten any progressist legislation in the last 50 years, isn’t that an illusion that our progressists “public intellectuals” imagine that they, in the splendid institutional isolation, can “exert pressure” on President Obama to dismiss to his advisors, supporters and the public defense of the military intensification in favor of peace with Iran and the promotion of social justice to all our workers and un-employees?
Elections ‘08: Win-win situation for al-Qaa’idah November 4, 2008
Posted by revolution in : 'IrÄq, AfghÄnistÄn, JihÄd, News, Political Analysis, United States of Losers , 9 comments
Shortly, the world will witness who will take the throne of leading the Global Neo-Crusade against Islam. There are two camps that stand out amongst the disbelievers, namely the camp of Obama and the camp of McCain. Those who march behind Obama’s campaign have high hopes of seeing a brighter future for the United States with the pull out of the troops from ‘Iraq and the concentration of the violent Crusader war in Afghanistan and Pakistan. They also see more hope with the Economic situation under Obama’s rule.
As for the those who march behind McCain’s campaign, they only wish to see the continuation of the Crusade in ‘Iraq and in other Muslim lands. They are willing to sacrifice the Economic situation for a [losing] war in the Muslim lands.
The point that many are missing out though, is that with the victory to either one of them will give America’s chief enemy, al-Qaa’idah, a victory. Generally, it will give support to the global Jihadi movement, but we say al-Qaa’idah in particular because this was their invention or rather revival in the practical sense of the word. The movement may have started out 20 years ago, but it is this movement that has a hand in a number of Muslim lands, making it the first of its kind in Islamic history in the pages of the Jihad movements.
With the win of Obama, it will allow the Islamic State of ‘Iraq to regroup and strengthen (or in our opinion, operate more freely since they are just playing a cat and mouse game with the US), and ‘Iraq will become a major launching pad for the Jihad in the Levant. After this eventual spread, the entire Levant will perhaps become a launching pad for the Jihad against the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia in order to restore the Shari’ah. Many people hold the misconception that al-Qaa’idah’s main enemy is the United States. To an extent, that is true until the United States vanishes from world history, but the ultimate focus of this movement is the restoration of the Global Caliphate, starting from the Muslim lands - Saudi being the head of them - all the way across the furthest points in the Hemisphere (from the Arabian Peninsula). So with a major clash in Saudi (or a simple cowardly retreat of the Saudi Royal Family), it will give the Mujahideen enough ability to stream roll through Israel and recapture Jerusalem.
What a gift for Shaykh Usamah if Obama were to win! And of course, only Allah knows best what the future holds.
With the win of McCain, he will continue down the same line of stupidity that Bush’s Administration committed which will then eventually lead to the evaporation of the United States Empire, as we know it. McCain’s technical know-how in the field of Economics is a plain joke, and if he dies, his replacement is a soccer mom! All of this means that America’s financial stability will be standing upon a thin string that is as sharp as a katana sword. This will in-turn hurt the US Military (as it has already) and he plans on hurting the military even more by continuing the war in ‘Iraq with more troops (and there aren’t much left). The American’s have a curfew in the Middle East whereas the Mujahideen don’t and can wait it out for as long as it takes. Everyone knows that America cannot stay in the Middle East forever because this war will carry on for generations and the American’s will forever remain as open targets. If McCain decides to go with a mandatory draft, then he will pretty much drain the economy and fill the American people’s temperamental resentment, which will most likely end up in the form of a civil war within America similar to that of what occurred in New Orleans after Katrina. The Crusade which he wishes to lead in ‘Iraq will eventually open up in Syria (thanks to the recent American invasion of Syria’s borders) and the neighboring lands, which will only spread the American forces thin. If one were to meet a sizeable amount of the Muslims from that part of the world, the words “anti-America” is written all over them. This disposition is not going to die out, but rather, it is going to only grow as they will teach their kids (and the generations after them) to hate America; and a major part of this has to with the fact that Israel ceases to exist without massive support from America.
Another aspect to this election is that both candidates have a fixated focus on Pakistan. Our prediction, and Allah knows best, is that there will be two major revivals in the Islamic world, one of which we are already seeing. The first is Pakistan. With Pakistan as the focus, America seeks to grab its Western region by the throat so that it can eventually cut the arteries of the Jihad in Afghanistan; and it is Allah whom the Mujahideen depend on (not Pakistan or any leader). Obama is willing to wage a full-fledged Crusade inside of Pakistan in order to control it, which will only add to the hatred of Pakistan’s citizen’s already-fueled hatred for the United States. This only spells disaster for the United States’ future. McCain, however, seems to want to play diplomatic with Pakistan’s Government which probably entails that he will send his highly trained troops to Pakistan to train Pakistan’s Army (as Bush has already begun). In reality, that kind of training means nothing when it comes to facing these type of Mujahideen. In other words, the United States - who cannot defeat and already admitted defeat in the face of the Mujahideen of Afghanistan - want to train the Pakistani’s who are facing the same exact Mujahideen (or same in training) of Afghanistan.
It’s a hopeless case for the United States and a waste of time in the end.
The second major revival which we predict is Egypt. Dr. Ayman al-Zawahiri showed heavy interest in that region in his book, “The Exoneration” which could indicate that there is something in the works. From our knowledge, officially, there already is an al-Qaa’idah of Egypt as they have released quite a few statements in the past year. To my guess, they remain underground for a very good reason related to security. So America would have to eventually take Egypt more seriously and this would probably be the icing on the cake for America’s end.
To reiterate, with Obama’s win, Shaykh Usaamah will most probably see the fruits of his efforts. With McCain’s win, Shaykh Usaamah will enjoy seeing the destruction of the “head of the snake”. That type of destruction only makes it easier for al-Qaa’idah to fulfill its purpose. Michael Scheuer has blatantly said that both candidates are clueless about the war on terrorism and that America will continue to “march to the drum of al-Qaa’idah.” I second that.
The Muslim World Must Free Itself from this Failing Capitalist System October 20, 2008
Posted by revolution in : Advice, Political Analysis, True Journalism, United States of Losers , 1 comment so farfinancial-crisis.eu
The historic events of the past few weeks cannot be overstated. Even the IMF has come to terms that the western financial system is on the brink of meltdown. The economic fallout is predicted to be huge, with recession likely to hit major western economies. The extent of the inevitable political fallout is hard to predict as the USA, the world’s only superpower, is teetering on the edge of bankruptcy. Many view the USA as the world new ‘sick man’. But global markets and economies are so intertwined if this ‘sick man’ falls, many states could be crushed beneath. At this time of crisis, The Muslim world has a huge opportunity and responsibility. For as leaders in the west flounder for solutions to this crisis in Capitalism – a crisis that was as inevitable as night follows day, due to inherent flaws in the system – Islam has real solutions in this field that would prevent the seismic shocks this inherently unstable free market will always produce with its cyclical boom and bust. capitalism_large.jpgSo what are some of the key problems and how does Islam’s system contrast:
1. Unrestrained credit creation because of the interest based economy.
An interest based system means that banks will always seek to maximize profits from lending. In doing so, they have lent more than they possess in assets by an enormous scale. There has been no effective regulation or restraint on the system and this model reaped huge profits. However, the knock-on effects on the rest of the economy are set to be colossal – on businesses, individuals who are set to lose their jobs and on the taxpayer who has effectively absorbed the risk whilst bankers have made the profits.
The Islamic system prohibits the giving or taking of interest payments, so naturally avoids the get rich quick schemes from lending. Investment of wealth is in the real economy where sharing of risks and rewards is between business partners without banking middle men who control the flow of credit to their advantage.
2. Paper based currencies.
In the free market model money is not backed by any commodity. Governments bail themselves out of debt by simply printing more money or extending credit lines. We have seen the inflationary effects of this in an exponential rise in fuel and food prices this year – leaving people in poor countries on the brink of starvation. The fragile nature of these paper based currencies was exposed in the late 1990’s with currencies collapsing in South East Asian due to market speculation. Currently, the US is massively in debt (<10 trillion dollars). The US will ultimately pay much less (to their creditors like China, Japan, etc) when the dollar depreciates further (as it has been) through their accelerated printing. But the cost of this falls back on the ordinary citizens – through greater taxes, cuts in social/health service spending and a rise in the cost of living that is the result of printing more money.
The Islamic system has a stable and real currency based on gold and silver standard which cannot be created by the state treasury out of thin air. This means that money has a real value behind them and forces people to live within their means. They cannot artificially create wealth for a few, ultimately creating misery for the many.
3. Financial services industry is out of control and is effectively a gambling market.
The derivatives industry is not the real economy but betting or ‘hedging’ on how markets/measures of the real economy will move. This market is “estimated” at 600 to 1,000 trillion dollars and is 10-20 times larger than the real global economy at $50 trillion. The counterparty risks (other side of the contract) are so large and widespread now that many banks, pension funds, investment funds, hedge funds and even countries (Iceland for example) could collapse. The domino effect of these failures will be massive and has the potential to bring the whole economy down – it will likely be too large for many governments to cope with.
The Islamic system has a clear regulation of company law, anti-gambling legislation, prohibits short-selling and non-futures contracts, and specific laws regulating the sale/purchase of commodities and currencies. Islam has clear financial contract laws controlling all of these excesses which are predictable and preventable.
4. The Free Market!
Capitalism now stands on the brink. Economies, staggering from crisis to crisis, now require massive state intervention and nationalisation. This runs completely counter to their very own principles. Their notion of the “free market” has been exposed as a lie, and has failed. The official response - a promise of new and better regulation – has an appalling track record of dealing with underlying problems (where has Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) post Enron era helped in the current crisis?). It is also contradictory to the “free market” philosophy. Regulation merely presents a challenge for traders to look for loopholes to run legitimate trade, but by the same rules that produce the crisis we are currently witnessing.
The Islamic system has a system of ruling and economy which is transparent, stable and has a track record of consistent success over several centuries. Rulers are subject to the law and do not invent new laws at the first crisis. When a system is so fragile that it needs constant amendment what does that say about the system?
It could be said that the Islamic system provides the only truly stable free market. The fixed laws of regulation cannot be changed by a whim and powerful lobbies – and people can invest and trade in a market freely within those rules.
So where are the Muslims today? Islam has the solutions to this crisis, yet it is nowhere to be seen in the Muslim world. We sit idly by and watch the world economy fail with untold misery to a large percentage of the world population. Furthermore, regimes in the Muslim world - who have invested heavily in propping up this failed system, at the expense of their own population – may see their economies crushed under the falling ‘sick-man’ of the United States.
Our countries and their corrupt regimes are part of the problem and if anything are helping to try and prop up the failing system (sovereign wealth funds, bank bailouts, and even having their currencies pegged to the US$). Many non-Muslims will be shaken to the very core by this crisis; they have never experienced anything like it. They are interested in alternatives and we must be there to present the only alternative.
It is time for the Muslim world to liberate itself from this failed system, establish the Caliphate (al-Khilafah) and a model market that others will see, Insha’Allah, provides an inherently more stable and just system, not pandering and fuelling the greed of human nature, coupled with the responsibility to help the poorest in society such that wealth does not remain the monopoly of a few.
Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan: US Economic Crisis Indicates the Beginning of the Fall of the American Empire October 19, 2008
Posted by revolution in : AfghÄnistÄn, Political Analysis, United States of Losers , 1 comment so far17-10-2008
In the Name of Allah, the Most Beneficent, the Most Merciful
The US economy and the credit crisis have reached a phase that can not be easily turned back. Neither America nor the European monetary funds and banks have any effective way out strategy. The European Union Summit in Paris, far from giving any financial shoulder to US to save it from a depression, tried to stay away from the negative impacts of the crisis. In a flurry of efforts to evade the negative spill over of the current US credit crisis, the members of the European Union are openly lambasting the US Administration for its stubborn military approach towards world affairs, which consequently ushered the present financial quagmire. In another word, the current economic crisis is, in fact, a sign of the fall of the American empire.
A distinguished British political analyst in his recently published analysis in the well-known Daily Observer, says that what we are witnessing in the American stock exchange markets are not only shocking but unbelieving. This crisis has brought under question the very economic principles of the West which they believe in; its dimension is so deep and wide that recovery seems almost impossible. It will expectedly result into ending the dominance of America over the world.
Likewise, those countries who have economical ties with America and have been enjoying economical and financial coordination and those who had effusively purchased shares in the American stock markets and had turned their back on their own traditional economic system, are now in peril with burning among the same flames which are encircling the American stock exchange and credit system, consequently, they face bankruptcy.
We ask the American and the western thinkers and scholars, the founders and advocates of the open market Capitalism, who for a long time been advocating the expansion of this system to all corners of the world under the exploitative slogans of democracy and republic, thus exploiting and plundering natural resources of almost half of the world, would the oppressed nations not bring you to justice for what you have done to them through your historical and diabolical economic exploitative cobweb of machinations that you were sucking their blood and eating their bones?
Do you not think that this crisis will not bring on you the same fate as of the former Soviet Union which also faced bankruptcy, omitting you resultantly from the surface of the map of the world?
The Afghan Muslims who like other countries citizens have been oppressed, tortured and have suffered as a result of American tyranny and illegal invasions are of the opinion that those days are not very far when this giant fiendish power will at first face economic crisis, then, its military power and cutting edge technology will fail in fiasco, along with its well equipped army and military barracks. This is an easy task for Allah (Swt) to do.
Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan
Stuck in the Cold (McBama’s Nostalgia for the 20th Century)
Posted by revolution in : Political Analysis, United States of Losers , add a commentThe following is taken from Taki’s Magazine:
Michael Scheuer
In his new and intensely interesting and provocative book, Churchill Hitler, and the Unnecessary War, Patrick J. Buchanan quotes British statesman Lord Salisbury thusly: “the commonest error in politics … [is] sticking to the carcass of dead policies.” We in America are now living the piping days of a presidential campaign in which all candidates pledge to deliver “policy change” in everything from energy policy to health care to financial reform and re-regulation. Above all, the candidates promise “change” in foreign policy.” As president, Barack Obama “would reject the Bush Doctrine of preemption and regime change and replace it with a doctrine of prevention and cooperation and, ladies and gentlemen, this is the biggest ticket item that we have in this election,” said Senator Biden on 2 October 2008. Well, as a professor of mine advised: “If you have to tell a lie, speak quickly. It sounds good and folks will focus on the next words before the lie registers.”
While it is harsh to say Senator Biden lied, neither he nor the three other candidates will do anything new in the foreign-policy arena—they will defend the Cold War’s carcasses to the last dollar, soldier, and Marine. All four are outspoken devotees of the grand strategy used in the Cold War, and, given our present foreign-policy train wreck, it ought to spur dread that Senator Biden and Governor Palin say they concur with advice from the last five U.S. secretaries of state. The foreign policy the four advocates is unrelenting U.S. interventionism, a Cold War-recipe that helped to destroy the USSR, but now is inapplicable and detrimental to U.S. interests. While both parties’ have since 1991 called for “out-of-the-box thinking” and a “new foreign-policy paradigm,” they have acted—witness Iraq, Bosnia, Somalia, and Pakistan—in the tradition they know: intervene in other people’s affairs and wars at all times and in all places.
Cold War foreign-policy thinking has several important characteristics, but three suffice to assess how much change – if any – can be expected from the quartet on the hustings. During the Cold War it was accepted that:
(1) In war, time is on America’s side, and our foe has no say in its result
(2) Proxies can be hired to fight our battles
(3) Spreading democracy means more peace
Are these pieces of common wisdom still valid? The answer is definite no, and here is why.
Time is not on America’s side and our foe has a vote
When the Cold War ended it was clear that time had been on America’s side. After the doctrine of deterrence through Mutually Assured Destruction was in place – and all but ruled out a U.S.-USSR war – the WMD known as Soviet economic policy and Ronald Reagan’s efforts destroyed the workers’ paradise. With Soviets gone, however, the world became a more dangerous place for America, one where threats to U.S. national security cannot be easily understood, much less reliably deterred. And yet under Mssrs. Clinton and Bush, Washington continued to behave as if it had all the time in the world to find an exactly right policy before moving to defend America.
In Iraq, for example, four years past before Washington could launch a coherent policy—the “surge”—and, even then, the policy is not aimed at winning, but on reducing violence to limit the media’s focus on Iraq during the current campaign; allow the Republicans to side-line this hot issue; and permit Senator McCain to benefit from removing 8,000 troops and make superficially plausible his claim that U.S. “strategy has succeeded. And we are winning in Iraq. And we will come home with victory and with honor.” And Senators Obama and Biden? Well, they condemn the decision to invade Iraq—kind of a no-brainer—and call for full withdrawal in the next sixteen months by turning the war over to Baghdad and making a “shift in responsibility to Iraq … it’s time for them to spend their own money and have the 400 thousand troops we trained for them begin to take their own responsibility.” Again, both positions sound plausible if said fast.
Question: What is common to the candidates’ positions?
Answer: A clear ignorance of the Islamist threat and the fact that time does not favor the United States.
From the first, the invasion of Iraq gave America a world-class enemy—Osama bin Laden and al-Qaeda, as well as the Islamist movement they symbolize and inspire. The U.S. invasion afforded a perfect Koranic predicate for a defensive jihad: an infidel power, invading a Muslim state without provocation, and creating a regime run man-made and not divine law. This act transformed bin Laden and al-Qaeda from a man and a group to a philosophy and a movement. And has that been movement been sitting and waiting to be destroyed while Washington picks a policy from among “shock and awe”; “there are a few dead-enders, but no insurgents”; “bring it on”; and the now the sainted “surging”? No, the Islamists have been simultaneously licking wounds inflicted by Iraqi Sunnis—not U.S. forces—and quietly solidifying the Iraq bases from which they are infiltrating influence, fighters, and violence into Syria, Jordan, Lebanon, and Israel.
When the Iraq insurgency’s lull ends—and lulls in insurgencies always end—Americans will see a still-strong Sunni insurgency ready to fight both the less-numerous, so less-capable U.S. forces and the bloodthirsty Shiite ascendancy we have built. We also will see two other groups fighting beside the Sunni mujahedin: (a) the men of the Sunni Awakening Councils, whom we have abandoned with their families to the tender mercies of Shias bent on payback for Saddam’s regime; and (b) al-Qaeda fighters welcomed back to fight in the communal war. Withal, the four candidates are confident that more time – be it McCain’s open-ended period or Obama’s 16 months—will ensure U.S. victory, and that the Islamists have not exploited years we have been/will be in Iraq—which, one must recall, is contiguous to Turkey, the Levant, and Saudi Arabia—to pose a dire threat to U.S. regional interests and allies. They are whistling past the graveyard.
As America Collapses US Government Secret Plans Revealed October 6, 2008
Posted by revolution in : Advice, News, Political Analysis, United States of Losers , 1 comment so farA secret meeting of Congress discusses immanent martial law.
B.A. Brooks
The United American Freedom Foundation
On March 13th 2008 there was a secret closed door meeting of The United States House Of Representatives in Washington. In the history of The United States this is only the fourth time a secret meeting was held by the house. Even though Representatives are sworn to secrecy by House Rules XVII, some of the members were so shocked, horrified, furious, and concerned about the future of America by what was revealed to them inside the secret meeting, that they have started to leak this secret information to independent news agencies around the world. The mass media said almost nothing about the secret meeting of the House, mentioning only one of the items being discussed. (The new surveillance techniques that are going to be used by the U.S. Government to watch all American citizens). The story was first released in a newspaper out of Brisbane, Australia revealing the contents of the secret U.S. Government meeting and plans for America including all of it’s citizens. Shortly there after, David J. Meyer from Last Trumpet Ministries found it and made it more available for the world to see.
Here is what was revealed:
* The imminent collapse of the U.S. Economy to occur sometime in late 2008
* The imminent collapse of the U.S. Government finances sometime in mid 2009
* The possibility of Civil War inside the United States as a result of the collapse
* The advance round-ups of “insurgent U.S. Citizens” likely to move against the government
* The detention of those rounded up at The REX 84 Camps constructed throughout the United States
* The possibility of public retaliation against members of Congress for the collapses
* The location of safe facilities for members of Congress and their families to reside during massive civil unrest
* The necessary and unavoidable merger of The U.S. with Canada and Mexico establishing The North American Union
* The issuance of a new currency called the AMERO for all three nations as an economic solution.
Except for a few hundred thousand U.S. Patriots, most Americans have no clue what has really been going on within The United States over the past 100 years, and the sad thing is that most do not want to know the truth. The further you look into the rabbit hole, the deeper it gets. Go to any currency conversion site and convert U.S. dollars to Euros so you can see for yourself the massive decline of the dollar. Look at how much money is and has been spent on the Iraq War to date, ($12 billion per month). Look at our currency and when it stopped being backed by gold.
The Federal Reserve is not federal but a private bank who does not have Americans best interests at heart. We no longer have any manufacturing really based out of America and there is no way that our economy can survive this incredible strain very much longer. The IRS strong arms every American yearly with income taxes, yet there are no laws saying an income tax is to be paid.
The CIA is involved in everything from global drug trafficking and covert military missions, to assassinations around the world and including U.S. Soil. Look at JFK for instance. It did not take long after JFK announced that he was going disband the CIA that he was shot in Texas. America’s new StasiThe Department Of Homeland Security is and has been slowly eradicating our rights for a few years now. based organization called
House Bill H.R. 1955/S-1959 was read by the senate and then sent to DHS for some reason, but is now back and sure to pass. Once passed, this bill introduced by Jane Harman (D/CA), will be the proverbial last nail hammered into every American patriots coffin. H.R. 4279 or the Prioritizing Resources and Organization for Intellectual Property Act of 2008 which was recently passed by the U.S. House of Representatives, will give the government draconian powers to do just this. This legislation gives the government the power to seize property that facilitates the violation of intellectual property laws. The legislation also mandates the formation of a formal Intellectual Property Enforcement Division within the office of the Deputy Attorney General to enforce this insanity…
It has been revealed that F.E.M.A. has been building internment camps all over America granting Halliburton a massive $385 million dollar construction contract to make this happen. Most of these sites only need refurbished because they are mostly closed prisons, old WW2 internment camps still intact and other facilities taken over by the government. Some people have referred to them as F.E.M.A. Death Camps where the infamous Red list/Blue Lists will be used to decide who goes where.
Whether you believe that The NWO/Illuminati/Globalization is real or not, there is a lot of proof that exposes definite plans or plots by the rich, political and religious elite to bring on an era of the end times. It is almost like some individuals are trying to make bible prophecy come true in their own sick and twisted ways. Not to mention that the world only has about 10 to 15 years of drinking water left before the wars fought for oil today will be fought for water in the near future. It has been said that these powers want to depopulate the planet of over 30% of it’s human inhabitants in the coming years. Examine all of the executive orders that have been signed into place allowing the president to basically become dictator in control of all government from tribal to federal in the event of any national emergency.
If you did not know, In late 2006, Congress revised the Posse Comitatus Act and the Insurrection Act to make it far easier for a president to declare martial law. Those changes were repealed at the end of this January as part of Public Law 110-181 (HR 4986), the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (signed into law by President Bush on January 28, 2008). Unfortunately it is not the great victory in which one might think because of the total militarization of all local and State police forces all across America.
Will there be martial law? Is martial law coming soon to America? When you see law enforcement being armed with automatic weapons, bullet proof vests and riot gear in small towns that have not had a murder or crime in years, then you have to ask yourself why.
The United States has more people locked up in prisons today than Russia and China combined. It comes out to one in every hundred Americans is behind bars. Our once great country that our ancestors fought and died for has become exactly the tyrants they were fighting. Fascists! When has America ever used words like Homeland? Never!
If you spend a few weeks reading all the info, watching the videos and following the links at The U.A.F.F., you will then have a better understanding of what has led to The Decline And Fall Of America. Remember that Knowledge is power! Learn, look, listen, read, share, prepare, train, stock up on food and water supply for one year.
Fill your pantry with non perishable foods, medicines, cooking oils, tinned meats and veggies. Flour, oats dried corn peas, beans and lentils.. Teach your self how to preserve food for storage. Check out your local potable/ drinking water supplies, non perfumed chlorine bleach is a good sterilizer for water, about 2 teaspoons full per 2 gallon bucket, stirred well and allowed to stand for at least 24 hours with a lid on it or until it no longer smells of bleach. Boiling water helps but it is not always enough to kill off the bacteria which can resist high temperatures.
Americans have been warned for years of the things to come, but have blindly looked away from the truth, which has been available for all to see. There are no more excuses not to prepare for the possible future. The time to act is now before it is too late. Check The United American Freedom Foundation for daily updates and news you won’t see in the mainstream media.
